Nintendo has taken a firm stance against the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in its first-party game development, emphasizing its extensive experience and concerns over intellectual property (IP) rights. This decision sets the company apart from competitors who are increasingly embracing AI to streamline game creation.
During a recent shareholder Q&A, Nintendo President Shuntaro Furukawa addressed the topic of AI in game development. He acknowledged that while AI has long been used to control enemy character movements, the more recent trend of generative AI presents unique challenges. “Generative AI, which has been a hot topic in recent years, can be more creative, but we also recognize that it has issues with intellectual property rights,” Furukawa stated.
Furukawa highlighted Nintendo’s decades of expertise in crafting optimal gaming experiences. He stressed that the company aims to deliver value that is unique and cannot be replicated through technology alone. “We have decades of know-how in creating optimal gaming experiences for our customers, and while we remain flexible in responding to technological developments, we hope to continue to deliver value that is unique to us and cannot be achieved through technology alone,” he said.
This cautious approach mirrors that of Sony, whose CEO Kenichiro Yoshida recently remarked that AI is “not a substitute for human creativity” and should be seen as a technology that supports rather than replaces human ingenuity.
While Nintendo remains open to technological advancements, Furukawa’s comments suggest a deliberate and measured approach to AI integration. This is in stark contrast to companies like Ubisoft and EA, which have been more enthusiastic about AI’s potential. Ubisoft President Yves Guillemot has expressed high expectations for generative AI, believing it will make in-game worlds feel “more alive and richer.” Similarly, EA CEO Andrew Wilson has estimated that AI could impact more than 50% of the company’s game development process.
Despite the industry’s growing interest in AI, Nintendo’s stance underscores its commitment to protecting IP rights and maintaining the unique quality of its games. As Furukawa noted, the company remains flexible but cautious, aiming to balance innovation with the preservation of its creative integrity.
As the debate over AI’s role in game development continues, Nintendo’s position highlights the complexities and potential pitfalls of integrating new technologies into creative processes. For now, the gaming giant appears content to rely on its rich history and proven expertise, ensuring that its games remain distinct and true to its brand.
Stay tuned for more updates on the evolving landscape of AI in gaming.
More for you:
- Nintendo says it doesn’t need generative AI to make games because it has “decades of know-how” and doesn’t want any “issues with intellectual property rights” | GamesRadar+
- Nintendo won’t use generative AI in its first-party games
- Nintendo has no plans to use generative AI in games, instead delivering value that “cannot be created through technology alone”
- Nintendo Has No Plans to Use Generative AI in First-Party Games